Fix an issue where dsp.c would interpret multiple dtmf events from a single key press.

When receiving calls from a mobile phone into a DISA system on a connection with
significant interference, the reporter's Asterisk system would interpret DTMF incorrectly
and replicate digits received. This patch resolves that by increasing the number of
frames a mismatch has to be detected before assuming the DTMF is over by 1 frame and
adjusts dtmf_detect function to reset hits and misses only when an edge is detected.

(closes issue ASTERISK-17493)
Reported by: Alec Davis
Patches:
	bug18904-refactor.diff.txt uploaded by Alec Davis (license 5546)
Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1130/
........

Merged revisions 349728 from http://svn.asterisk.org/svn/asterisk/branches/1.8
........

Merged revisions 349729 from http://svn.asterisk.org/svn/asterisk/branches/10


git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@349730 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
This commit is contained in:
Jonathan Rose
2012-01-05 22:02:33 +00:00
parent ebf40f1129
commit fd04da5114

View File

@@ -201,9 +201,9 @@ enum gsamp_thresh {
#define DTMF_GSIZE 102
/* How many successive hits needed to consider begin of a digit */
#define DTMF_HITS_TO_BEGIN 2
#define DTMF_HITS_TO_BEGIN 4
/* How many successive misses needed to consider end of a digit */
#define DTMF_MISSES_TO_END 3
#define DTMF_MISSES_TO_END 4
/*!
* \brief The default silence threshold we will use if an alternate
@@ -721,42 +721,41 @@ static int dtmf_detect(struct ast_dsp *dsp, digit_detect_state_t *s, int16_t amp
}
}
if (s->td.dtmf.current_hit) {
/* We are in the middle of a digit already */
if (hit != s->td.dtmf.current_hit) {
s->td.dtmf.misses++;
if (s->td.dtmf.misses == s->td.dtmf.misses_to_end) {
/* There were enough misses to consider digit ended */
s->td.dtmf.current_hit = 0;
if (hit == s->td.dtmf.lasthit) {
if (s->td.dtmf.current_hit) {
/* We are in the middle of a digit already */
if (hit) {
if (hit != s->td.dtmf.current_hit) {
/* Look for a start of a new digit.
This is because hits_to_begin may be smaller than misses_to_end
and we may find the beginning of new digit before we consider last one ended. */
s->td.dtmf.current_hit = 0;
} else {
/* Current hit was same as last, so increment digit duration (of last digit) */
s->digitlen[s->current_digits - 1] += DTMF_GSIZE;
}
} else {
/* No Digit */
s->td.dtmf.misses++;
if (s->td.dtmf.misses == s->td.dtmf.misses_to_end) {
/* There were enough misses to consider digit ended */
s->td.dtmf.current_hit = 0;
}
}
} else {
s->td.dtmf.misses = 0;
/* Current hit was same as last, so increment digit duration (of last digit) */
s->digitlen[s->current_digits - 1] += DTMF_GSIZE;
}
}
/* Look for a start of a new digit no matter if we are already in the middle of some
digit or not. This is because hits_to_begin may be smaller than misses_to_end
and we may find begin of new digit before we consider last one ended. */
if (hit) {
if (hit == s->td.dtmf.lasthit) {
} else if (hit) {
/* Detecting new digit */
s->td.dtmf.hits++;
} else {
s->td.dtmf.hits = 1;
}
if (s->td.dtmf.hits == s->td.dtmf.hits_to_begin && hit != s->td.dtmf.current_hit) {
store_digit(s, hit);
s->td.dtmf.current_hit = hit;
s->td.dtmf.misses = 0;
if (s->td.dtmf.hits == s->td.dtmf.hits_to_begin) {
store_digit(s, hit);
s->td.dtmf.current_hit = hit;
}
}
} else {
s->td.dtmf.hits = 0;
s->td.dtmf.hits = 1;
s->td.dtmf.misses = 1;
s->td.dtmf.lasthit = hit;
}
s->td.dtmf.lasthit = hit;
/* If we had a hit in this block, include it into mute fragment */
if (squelch && hit) {
if (mute.end < sample - DTMF_GSIZE) {